I disagree.
I think the fact that you're retarded, is very relevant to the conversation.
you trying to go offtopic knowing you have zero replies back to what i already pointed out.
google looks only in keywords
history channel article did say religion was one of many reasons while you say no to it.
wikipedia is a whole list of history channel inaccurate amount of history, if wikipedia can only only do one thing is make a good list.
yet you refuse and say religion is not the cause with no way to say way.
Did you forget what was said?
I'll quote the start for you:
The fall of Rome was far more complex than religion. And religion was not one of the major factors. It may have been the final blow for the Byzantines, but it was not the cause of their fall, and had very little to do the the split.
I have provided a couple sources. Wikipedia, all google results, and all other reputable sources say you're wrong.
You have provided nothing.
Nothing at all.
Except evidence that you're brain is not fully functioning.
And that you don't understand how search engines work.
You are without question the dumbest person on the internet.
In a sea of stupid, you mange to stand out.
Congratulations, I'm impressed.
oh now you go offtopic thinking it will help you, nope that isn't going to help.