if you rejecting me from the start then it can only mean you are the guy in the video because he too rejected all the real facts.
yes the phase makes sense because this conversation as to end and knowing phuks programming i think there is a limit somewhere before it stops.
you didnt cite any sources, you give me a article of history channel and ask me to go to wikipedia which both of them also agree that religion was part of the chaos. also back to sentance one about you being that guy, you think you have cited sources but you keep referencing back to the crazy theory guy. the only answer would be that you are that crazy theory guy.
if you after youtube money think again, your videos are not going to be in ads. behind backdoors youtube give advertisers the ability to only allow certain channels to make ads. yours will not be from those guys or any real people, you will only get money on scam people and people who do not know how adwords works.
yes the phase makes sense
kek
you didnt cite any sources
Do you know what the word 'cite' means? Obviously not.
'All of written history'
You still have not show a single reference or citation.
Not one. You don't like the History channel, but are unable to find anything to dispute it.
Nothing at all.
them also agree that religion was part of the chaos.
Read slower, this is what I said:
"The fall of Rome was far more complex than religion. And religion was not one of the major factors.
It may have been the final blow for the Byzantines, but it was not the cause of their fall, and had very little to do the the split."
Move your lips while you read if you need to.
if you after youtube money think again, your videos are not going to be in ads. behind backdoors youtube give advertisers the ability to only allow certain channels to make ads. yours will not be from those guys or any real people, you will only get money on scam people and people who do not know how adwords works.
You're not just dumb, eh. You're insane too?
What does youtube, ads, and money have to do with anything?
TAKE YOUR MEDS.
i knew you were the one in the video, so you added a bunch of nonsense to a video for money. also you did not write those history other people did who AT THE TIME did not have tools to find answers. we are talking about records from 70s, 80s, 90s. They all have lack of better tools.
Also Rome is still much alive, it was never called Byzantine Empire. Yes in italy there is rome, after all that talk you never even thought about today's era. what you mistently gotten wrong is the dead of a person who ruled an empire but rome can only die if its people die which has not happen. Sure its not rome like in very old days but it didn't die like Byzantine (turkey took down that empire).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byzantine_Empire
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rome#Early_modern
I will give you 3 guess who the roman pope is and you tell me if religion was not the cause.
http://mariamilani.com/ancient_rome/religious-aspects-in-the-fall-of-the-roman-empire.htm
http://www.pbs.org/empires/romans/empire/christians.html
https://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/ancient-rome/ancient-rome-and-religion/
http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/ancient/romans/christianityromanempire_article_01.shtml
What do you mean 'now'? I've been rejecting it from the start.
Do you think that phrase makes sense?
The sources I cited are all of written history.
The sources you have cited are nothing.
Really? Are you sure about that?
Do you think I have been 'arguing' with you or 'mocking' you?