I've been convinced one particular regular voat user is FBI or affiliated w/ some govt. group. You can find plenty of stories where the FBI infiltrates groups and creates "terrorists" to prosecute. In some cases they've targeted the mentally ill and in other they've offered exorbitant funding to encourage a manufactured threat. Just search it. There's no shortage of cases. I'm thinking of a particular and constant voat user that regularly encourages violence and regularly escalates conversations to death threats. I can't be the only person that has noticed this cunts pattern. Do you know who I'm talking about? When voat went down I honestly thought this cunt had created a case.
Well said. I remember during the @she debacle I kept pointing out that brigading is the reason we left Reddit. I was called a shill, and people kept telling me how I opposed free speech. Absolutely rediculous.
I love asking people what they're doing in the world to fix whatever they see as the problem. Like if they're calling for violence, I always ask why they're on Voat posting instead of killing group X. The replies are always the same "raising awareness". Except they're not. They're calling for violence, but they're just massive cowards who are afraid of doing the dirty work themselves.
I don't support genocide or random killings. Violence begets violence and if the alt-right geta violent, it will only justify the cries and accusations of the left. But I still think people should enact the change they want to see in the world. It's more productive than bitching on the internet where only a few hundred people are going to see your post anyway.
Well said. I remember during the @she debacle I kept pointing out that brigading is the reason we left Reddit. I was called a shill, and people kept telling me how I opposed free speech. Absolutely rediculous.
I love asking people what they're doing in the world to fix whatever they see as the problem. Like if they're calling for violence, I always ask why they're on Voat posting instead of killing group X. The replies are always the same "raising awareness". Except they're not. They're calling for violence, but they're just massive cowards who are afraid of doing the dirty work themselves.
I don't support genocide or random killings. Violence begets violence and if the alt-right geta violent, it will only justify the cries and accusations of the left. But I still think people should enact the change they want to see in the world. It's more productive than bitching on the internet where only a few hundred people are going to see your post anyway.
There's a lot of them over there that openly call for violence. That is one thing I never understood about Voat. Yes, I understand the JQ, I see the money being moved around between corporations and into lobbyists and shills pockets. I see the owl and the societies. I see the feds. I also see that the only way we can really do anything about it, is to fucking talk about it.
The more people that are aware of this alternate side to reality, the greater our chances of toppling the system are. But constantly going around talking about "nigger this, nigger that, burn the kikes lets be done with that!" is doing nothing to help. Another thing I've always thought was super wrong with Voat was the incessant in-grouping. How can you develop and grow a group when you hardcore silence anybody that doesn't want to fall in line with "niggerkikefaggot" ?
The very witchunts and brigades that drove them away from reddit are the same ones they employ on Voat. I tested some waters on an alternate account. I would pretty much say the same message in my posts, but on one account it was filled with the "niggerjewmudslime" speech, and on the other account I didn't use a single slur and instead tried to rationalize things with fucking English.
Can you guess which message was ignored?