8

11 comments

[–] jobes [OP] 0 points (+0|-0)

Assuming that it's big media/shadow government/whoever else control is not a baseless accusation, it's certainly possible, but notice that berniecrats, communists, etc. can be just as, if not more against big media and you don't hear about them getting banned.

I started getting you then lost you. What are you actually supporting?

[–] KFCNyanCat 2 points (+2|-0)

Skepticism.I find alternative news and mainstream news equally untrustworthy. How can I find NBC trustworthy when they are always hiding negative stories about parent company General Electric, and are extremely negative about the sitting US president to the point where they'll blindly rail against stuff that he supports regardless of what it is or who else supports it? And how can I trust Alex Jones when he reports conspiracy theories as news with little-to-no evidence, and makes his biases evident without attempt to suppress them.

What I was saying was that I'm skeptical of your claim that they're being silenced for speaking against big media since people on the left who do the same are rarely seen being banned.

That said, I made that comment without knowing that all of the stations in that video are owned by Sinclair Broadcasting Group, which at least means that this isn't some kind of journalism shadow government and is instead corruption from one corporation, which is a little better than what I initially thought.

[–] jobes [OP] 0 points (+0|-0)

Sinclair Broadcasting Group

That makes far more sense. They have some sorts of requirements relating to saying things word for word actually