I strongly support it. Internet providers have demonstrated that they want more revenue streams than their core business provides (providing internet service). Some have been caught inserting ads into webpages, hijacking domain lookups to direct traffic to an ad page, blocking sending mail to remote mail servers (must use their mail relay), messing up bittorrent with fake packets and of course throttling the competition's video streams. Some might even call the blocking of servers and incoming ports improper behaviour for a neutral ISP.
Your ISP controls your access to the magical land of cat videos: they have and will abuse that control to extract more money from you.
I strongly support it. Internet providers have demonstrated that they want more revenue streams than their core business provides (providing internet service). Some have been caught inserting ads into webpages, hijacking domain lookups to direct traffic to an ad page, blocking sending mail to remote mail servers (must use their mail relay), messing up bittorrent with fake packets and of course throttling the competition's video streams. Some might even call the blocking of servers and incoming ports improper behaviour for a neutral ISP.
Your ISP controls your access to the magical land of cat videos: they have and will abuse that control to extract more money from you.
I strongly support it. Internet providers have demonstrated that they want more revenue streams than their core business provides (providing internet service). Some have been caught inserting ads into webpages, hijacking domain lookups to direct traffic to an ad page, blocking sending mail to remote mail servers (must use their mail relay), messing up bittorrent with fake packets and of course throttling the competition's video streams. Some might even call the blocking of servers and incoming ports improper behaviour for a neutral ISP.
Your ISP controls your access to the magical land of cat videos: they have and will abuse that control to extract more money from you.