The site wasn't scaled down. It was recoded to cut costs associated with microsoft.
The site wasn't scaled down. It was recoded to cut costs associated with microsoft.
It was re-coded so that they could scale down hosting to reduce costs. That's where the wording comes from. As it was, it required a lot of software overhead beyond simply serving data.
It was re-coded so that they could scale down hosting to reduce costs. That's where the wording comes from. As it was, it required a lot of software overhead beyond simply serving data.
Thanks for that great link, PMYA. More people who are concerned about what happened to Voat should see it.
I am surprised because the article indicates that there was a "decision" to scale down Voat. If that were the case, than I am sure that PuttItOut would have informed the community in advance. I am not aware of any such notification. This makes me question the article.