That's a better explanation of the alt-right than most journalists would provide. But the argument that you shouldn't engage the alt-right because some might go hack a twitter account is complete BS and seems more like an excuse.
I'm also curios if the uploader can see racism and sexism on the side of the mainstream-left and "alt-left" or if he believes in the redefinition of racism and sexism (racism is prejudice + power or confusing "majority privilege" with racism).
That's a better explanation of the alt-right than most journalists would provide. But the argument that you shouldn't engage the alt-right because some might go hack a twitter account is complete BS and seems more like an excuse.
I'm also curios if the uploader can see racism and sexism on the side of the mainstream-left and "alt-left" or if he believes in the redefinition of racism and sexism (racism is prejudice + power or confusing "majority privilege" with racism).
That's a better explanation of the alt-right than most journalists would provide. But the argument that you shouldn't engage the alt-right because some might go hack a twitter account is complete BS and seems more like an excuse.
I'm also curios if the uploader can see racism and sexism on the side of the mainstream-left and "alt-left" or if he believes in the redefinition of racism and sexism (racism is prejudice + power or confusing "majority privilege" with racism).