Then what are you arguing?
I'm not arguing anything. Just answering your odd questions.
What does it mean that you have not provided sources yet there are ones?
Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look?
Didn't we talk about run-on sentences, and being clear through use of punctuation?
It's hard enough to find anything rational in your rambling.
Explain to me how it's possible that you have not provided sources and yet you say that there are sources.
It's hard enough to find anything rational in your rambling.
I get the impression that you're intentionally trying to be diffuse and argue over stupid semantics.
Explain to me how it's possible that you have not provided sources and yet you say that there are sources.
It's very simple. I have not provided sources and yet there still are sources.
A source does not stop being a source just because someone else provided it.
I get the impression that you're intentionally trying to be diffuse and argue over stupid semantics.
No. Be clear, and I will help you. But you're being very ambiguous, and that question can be taken in different ways. I think I know what you mean, but there is room for error. Be clear. Even a single comma can make a big difference.
Consider the following:
The boy helped his Uncle Jack, off the horse.
The boy helped his Uncle jack off the horse.
Not the same thing eh?
Then what are you arguing? What does it mean that you have not provided sources yet there are ones? *corrected