In america, yes. We can see a lot of "liberals" aligning themselves with muslims in america and in europe the very same thing is happening, where parties opposed to islamisation are considered far-right and parties inviting them are considered anywhere between slightly left of center to far left.
"The right is always the party sector associated with the interests of the upper or dominant classes, the left the sector expressive of the lower economic or social classes, and the centre that of the middle classes. Historically this criterion seems acceptable. The conservative right has defended entrenched prerogatives, privileges and powers; the left has attacked them. The right has been more favorable to the aristocratic position, to the hierarchy of birth or of wealth; the left has fought for the equalization of advantage or of opportunity, for the claims of the less advantaged. Defense and attack have met, under democratic conditions, not in the name of class but in the name of principle; but the opposing principles have broadly corresponded to the interests of the different classes.[13]"
The question again is, do we talk left/right relative to america or not?
The question again is, do we talk left/right relative to america or not?
No. You're deeply confused eh? But at least you're starting to learn that this is a complicated issue, not a simple binary one.
In america, yes.
Just to be sure I am hearing you correctly, you think Muslims are liberal?
Is my statement that in europe political parties that want to prevent islamisation are on the right and that political parties that invite them are on the left correct? Can we agree on that?
No. You're deeply confused eh? But at least you're starting to learn that this is a complicated issue, not a simple binary one.
No, it doesn't. Do you know what a 'dictionary' is?
That's not a dictionary.
Do you think Muslims are liberal?