While none of the girls were naked, prosecutors claimed they were in "sexualised" poses in skimpy clothing, including swimwear and bras.
I suppose I should trust the court's judgement here: probably if I saw those "sexualised" poses I would agree they deserve criminal prosecution. However, my first reaction was to be concerned that the same sort of images could be found in a child's clothing catalogue, or while walking on a public beach.
> While none of the girls were naked, prosecutors claimed they were in "sexualised" poses in skimpy clothing, including swimwear and bras.
I suppose I should trust the court's judgement here: probably if I saw those "sexualised" poses I would agree they deserve criminal prosecution. However, my first reaction was to be concerned that the same sort of images could be found in a child's clothing catalogue, or while walking on a public beach.
I suppose I should trust the court's judgement here: probably if I saw those "sexualised" poses I would agree they deserve criminal prosecution. However, my first reaction was to be concerned that the same sort of images could be found in a child's clothing catalogue, or while walking on a public beach.