12

7 comments

[–] x0x7 1 points (+1|-0) Edited

Move meat plant workers to freelancers.. sort of. I don't care what their actual employment designation is. The problem is the old fashioned way of scheduling a worker to come in or be fired creates a moral hazard in the presence of a pandemic when not only could an employee get sick, but their family might too. The acknowledgement of this moral hazard is what has lead to plants being shut down.

If instead you give employees unpaid time off at will and scheduling someone is more of an invitation to come in rather than a requirement under threat of penalty, then it is the employee's choice and the moral hazard is removed. Some people call that freelancing. Some would call it employment with an open door work policy. I don't care what you call it, it solves the problem.

It also would be an amazing shift in the way employment works. I'm coming in because I want to come in and I want to make money, not because I'll be screwed if I don't.

Yes, that would require restructuring the way a lot of offices do work, and would require more employee cross training, which is good for employers anyway.

But the alternative in the face of a pandemic is shutting down an entire site or facing lawsuits.

Why do you want to be 100% dependent on one person being there? Doesn't that end up fucking you over frequently anyway? What if an emergency happens? Do you want your company to be shut down every time any one of your employees has a personal emergency? Haven't they had them in the past and you didn't actually shut down? You can survive not having an employee there. You have before. And if you can't that's due to your own mismanagement. Switching to at will leave would get us to full commit to abandoning the idea of only having one person trained to do some task. And it may be needed for the pandemic, legally. If you are already slow and have too much staff because of the pandemic what will it hurt anyway. Now is a great time to make the switch and you might save some money when a few stay home a day and you might prevent a few layoffs from the saved money. It's equivalent to hiring fewer people while not actually firing anyone.

[–] revmoo 0 points (+0|-0)

scheduling someone is more of an invitation to come in rather than a requirement

You can't be serious. Have you never worked a job before?

[–] x0x7 0 points (+0|-0) Edited

Yes. And I've worked some really shitty ones lately thanks to the corona virus. I'm writing something radical for a reason. That's not lost on me. I'm telling you though, there are more businesses that could organize like this successfully than you realize. There are places that do organize like this currently, particularly a lot of software companies. To name one the motley fool. They are, in their own words, responsibility based. I'm just suggesting that more places could manage it than realize.

The motley fool is an open door office. Technically they aren't right now because of the virus. Right now they are a closed door office and people are working from home. But normally people there set their own hours. For companies that need to apply more guidance there are tools for that besides hell or high water dictation.

In the case of meat plants they may have to, because that would enable them to open plants that otherwise would be closed (or face lawsuits). All I'm saying is as a company you say if you don't want to work during corona virus you will not be fired. They have more workers than they need right now anyway. They are laying people off. If some people decide by themselves to take a month off (there call) then that's still a better situation than shutting down a plant and not employing workers who do want to work.

[–] revmoo 0 points (+0|-0)

There are places that do organize like this currently, particularly a lot of software companies.

Oh boy. I work in software. This could not be further from the truth.

I definitely agree with you that things are fucked up, but radical solutions are not what's needed to solve society's ills, and often come with a whole host of unexpected problems. Capitalism is really good at one thing, keeping people honest. By honest I mean honest exchange of value. The problems in our system is twofold; one, we subsidize risk for whole industries, second we don't have a "social" system of community that binds us together. For all its problems, church has always been really good about fostering social connections. Getting a proper community and social safety net is a priority that we should be looking to combine with capitalism, not replace.