We currently do prosecute and convict people who are below the legal limit. O.08 is more of a guideline then an absolute, as everyone has different physiology and thus are impacted by inebriation in different ways.
This, combined with the failed field test is pretty damming evidence.
Ignoring the fact that you would have to heat pounds upon pounds of hemp to achieve a detectable amount of THC. We always have and still do convict people over incredibly nominal amounts. For most of history it's been a pass/fail test with no discrimination over actual amounts.
We currently do prosecute and convict people who are below the legal limit. O.08 is more of a guideline then an absolute, as everyone has different physiology and thus are impacted by inebriation in different ways.
This, combined with the failed field test is pretty damming evidence.
Ignoring the fact that you would have to heat pounds upon pounds of hemp to achieve a detectable amount of THC. We always have and still do convict people over incredibly nominal amounts. For most of history it's been a pass/fail test with no discrimination over actual amounts.
We currently do prosecute and convict people who are below the legal limit. O.08 is more of a guideline then an absolute, as everyone has different physiology and thus are impacted by inebriation in different ways.
This, combined with the failed field test is pretty damming evidence.
Ignoring the fact that you would have to heat pounds upon pounds of hemp to achieve a detectable amount of THC. We always have and still do convict people over incredibly nominal amounts. For most of history it's been a pass/fail test with no discrimination over actual amounts.