When you see phrases like "rapid-fire assault rifle" and no fully-automatic capable weapons were involved, then I tend to consider it biased because that is just utter nonsense.
When you see phrases like "rapid-fire assault rifle" and no fully-automatic capable weapons were involved, then I tend to consider it biased because that is just utter nonsense.
The phrase "rapid-fire assault rifle" is clearly reported as an eyewitness statement.
Nowhere does the phrase "no fully-automatic capable weapons were involved" appear.
The phrase "rapid-fire assault rifle" is clearly reported as an eyewitness statement.
Nowhere does the phrase "no fully-automatic capable weapons were involved" appear.
More scare tactics to ban those evil ars. Pretty dumb, guarantee i could go in with a lever gun and a revolver and get a higher kill count.
More scare tactics to ban those evil ars. Pretty dumb, guarantee i could go in with a lever gun and a revolver and get a higher kill count.
I don't even own a gun, never have. I just don't like biased reporting (which is all reporting sadly)