The Supreme Court is taking up the highly anticipated case of the Colorado baker who refused to make a wedding cake for a same-sex couple.

What will really make it interesting is that both sides of this dispute have valid arguments. People shouldn't discriminate, but they should also not be forced to interact with people they don't want to. Someone has to have either their freedom, or feelings violated. In a situation like this you can't convince someone they are wrong, because nobody is. It is two correct ideas in conflict, so we each choose the one that we feel is more important. End result is two sides, both arguing that they are correct. And since they are, the argument is difficult to resolve. So, like I said above, I will settle for some consistency. One way or the other I will accept, as long as everyone is held to the same standard. I tend to value freedoms over feelings, but I value consistency in law, most of all.