counting ballots for a couple weeks now i think and they decide right now is the right time to throw that accusation out there. yeah, your totally not being manipulated bro.
*just gotta jump to the most extreme conclusion because DEMOCRATS BAD.
counting ballots for a couple weeks now i think and they decide right now is the right time to throw that accusation out there. yeah, your totally not being manipulated bro.
*just gotta jump to the most extreme conclusion because DEMOCRATS BAD.
and they decide right now is the right time to throw that accusation out there
Pretty much. They should be wrapping up here pretty soon.
*just gotta jump to the most extreme conclusion because DEMOCRATS BAD.
Establishment bad. Democrats totally not being manipulated. :-p
> and they decide right now is the right time to throw that accusation out there
[Pretty much](https://mobile.twitter.com/BarnettforAZ/status/1389215131184164874). They should be wrapping up here pretty soon.
> *just gotta jump to the most extreme conclusion because DEMOCRATS BAD.
Establishment bad. Democrats totally not being manipulated. :-p
yes, they got what they were looking for. an out so they would be off the hook for counting all the votes and save face with their supporters to continue the outrageous accusations that go well beyond the evidence.
yes, they got what they were looking for. an out so they would be off the hook for counting all the votes and save face with their supporters to continue the outrageous accusations that go well beyond the evidence.
If I understand correctly, when there is a problem with a ballot, the machines can throw an error and ask for a manual adjudication.
It keeps an image of the ballot and how it was adjudicated.
If some poll worker decided to, ahem, "fortify" the election by feeding a slanted batch of ballots through an extra time or two and overriding any errors, there would be a record, and fewer physical ballots than there are supposed to be.