That doesn't exactly sound unreasonable. The democrats, on the other hand, seem to think that this is the beginning of the apocalypse.
Having served on two grand juries I can tell you that there is NO WAY I would agree to allowing that information to be made public. GJ is not at all like you see on TV or in a jury trial in court. The most insane accusations are made and the witnesses have no legal representation with them. It's brutal. (By design.)
But armchair politicians don't realize this, think they're smarter than actual politicians and judges, etc.
"We will color-code the excisions from the report, and we will provide explanatory notes for each redaction,"
That's neat. Usually redacted is just a bunch of black bars with no clue to the why.
Here's the good part: