I'm not sure what you're asking.
But that was a facetious way of referring to women who have cast aside the traditional gender roles.
I'm not sure what you're asking.
But that was a facetious way of referring to women who have cast aside the traditional gender roles.
facetious
Ok.
Just wanted clarification. To me it sounded like a woman's place is in the kitchen and only the few are lucky enough to make it out.
>facetious
Ok.
Just wanted clarification. To me it sounded like a woman's place is in the kitchen and only the few are lucky enough to make it out.
The opposite.
My whole point is that women are not children, and they don't need a cookie or a pat on the head because they no longer act in a subservient way.
They are equals. Saying "That's good for a woman" is insulting and condescending.
I think this article is offensive to woman because it is praising a woman for doing what wouldn't be noteworthy if it was a man.
The opposite.
My whole point is that women are not children, and they don't need a cookie or a pat on the head because they no longer act in a subservient way.
They are equals. Saying "That's good *for a woman*" is insulting and condescending.
I think this article is offensive to woman because it is praising a *woman* for doing what wouldn't be noteworthy if it was a man.
Finds her way out?