Let me give a couple of different examples to see if you can get my point.
Should Chinese citizens be prohibited from holding a sign critizing their leaders in Tianimen Square? Should Russians be able to hold a sign during the victory day parade mentioning Soviet war crimes? According to your argument this is disrupting and malicous so their governments are justified to arrest them.
Let me give a couple of different examples to see if you can get my point.
Should Chinese citizens be prohibited from holding a sign critizing their leaders in Tianimen Square? Should Russians be able to hold a sign during the victory day parade mentioning Soviet war crimes? According to your argument this is disrupting and malicous so their governments are justified to arrest them.
Please extend things I say out of context, and extrapolate them to a retarded extreme.
Then misrepresent my viewpoint by putting words in my mouth.
I'm going to leave you waiting to figure out how long until I bother to waste my time with a serious reply.
Please extend things I say out of context, and extrapolate them to a retarded extreme.
Then misrepresent my viewpoint by putting words in my mouth.
I'm going to leave you waiting to figure out how long until I bother to waste my time with a serious reply.
I can tell a well reasoned and rational discussion is going to follow.
No. We do it everyday. Go outside more.
You do not have the right to speech anywhere at anytime. There are limitations, many.
You do not have the right to harass people, individually, or as a group. Holding a sign that is attempting to provoke is distracting, and malicious. It has nothing to do with free speech.
Because US prides itself on free speech, but even they have laws against this type of behaviour.
lol