8

9 comments

[–] Boukert [OP] 0 points (+1|-1)

And that is about all the reply i expected, thanks for proving my point!

[–] [Deleted] 0 points (+0|-0)

Last time I tried discussing anything with you you called me a Trump supporter like it wasa vicious insult. Why would I bother with anything but sarcasm from that point forward. Look forward to your great posts about two scoops and such.

[–] Boukert [OP] 1 points (+1|-0)

ah yeah I remember that two-part IRC remark you made. You chimed in after I had one of my regular discussion about politics with my good friend @jidlaph (we've been having these for over 3 years, well before phuks chat came along). I actually did not recognise your chat comment as "an attempt at a discussion" as it was nothing more then "an attempt at making a scoffing remark"...so don't get your knickers in a twist over me firing your own attitude right back at you with a snarky remark of my own.

You said something like this:

  • "@Boukert schooling someone about trumpism... lol" "@Boukert making imature (adding your typo for reference) remarks referring a book written by a lying leftist (something else) author... lol"

the book and author being "fire and fury" by Wolffe

My reply:

  • "Getting lectured by a Trump supporter about immature replies....topkek"

you called me a Trump supporter like it wasa vicious insult

I just called you; a Trump supporter who has the hypocrasy to call me out on making immature remarks about Potus.. That is called being blunt and direct (the Dutch are actually renowned for this, see the Hoekstra kerfuffle). If you think there was anything viscious or insulting in that remark, it would say a lot more about your state of mind then it would about mine!

[–] [Deleted] 0 points (+0|-0)

I actually commented that its weird that you are calling jidalph brainwashed when all you were doing was regurgitating garbage. But okay.