I could have sworn Wikipedia is meant to have articles from a neutral perspective. Perhaps the definition of neutral changed? Or perhaps neutrality is only for approved topics now?
I could have sworn Wikipedia is meant to have articles from a neutral perspective. Perhaps the definition of neutral changed? Or perhaps neutrality is only for approved topics now?
My God, I read the wikipedia to learn about it, and I cannot imagine a less balanced and larger smear campaign possible. Every single paragraph is full of attempts to discredit it. Free speech is definitely under attack, and every attempt to discredit platforms that allow it will be made through guilt by association, name calling, etc.