Many websites say they require first-party cookies for functionality.
They don't just say that, there are cookies for a reason.
It might be asking too much from script-blocking programs to distinguish between fake and real first-party cookies.
No, it works already with pretend-on-site images, so why not cookies?
In the end it's all a cat and mouse game between the consumer and the spammer.
> Many websites say they require first-party cookies for functionality.
They don't just say that, there are cookies for a reason.
> It might be asking too much from script-blocking programs to distinguish between fake and real first-party cookies.
No, it works already with pretend-on-site images, so why not cookies?
In the end it's all a cat and mouse game between the consumer and the spammer.
I get the impression your expertise is lacking, as is mine.
I get the impression your expertise is lacking, as is mine.
Many websites say they require first-party cookies for functionality. It might be asking too much from script-blocking programs to distinguish between fake and real first-party cookies.