seems like a case of being over optimistic over what you could pull off with the resources at hand.
technical problems could have lead to them hemorrhaging money
if you give them the benefit of the doubt.
seems like a case of being over optimistic over what you could pull off with the resources at hand.
technical problems could have lead to them hemorrhaging money
if you give them the benefit of the doubt.
How do people not understand the concept of not giving your money to someone without a good or service provided at the time of the exchange?