10

23 comments

[–] Sarcastaway 6 points (+6|-0)

CEOs of big tech companies: You almost certainly have incels as employees. What are you going to do about it?

Sounds like shes advocating prostitution as an addition to the employee benefits program.

But seriously, anyone that takes this bait is a noob. 5 years ago it was "forever alone," and now its "incel." Just one more way to get insecure and impressionable people fighting about shit that doesn't matter.

[–] djsumdog 0 points (+0|-0)

What are you going to do about it?

Implement programs and solutions that help people who are frustrated with romance and sexuality find solutions to their crippling loneliness? Well that's a hard problem, but I'm sure with some human ingenuity and --- oh no .. wait .. wait .. no she's just saying we should ban them. See there's a percentage of them that advocate violence, and rather than just moderate them, we should just ban all of them.

Men aren't allowed to be frustrated with crippling loneliness. If they are, then someone is obviously wrong with them.

[–] Sarcastaway 0 points (+0|-0)

Given that this is Reddit's ex-CEO we're talking about, I think its obvious that banning shit is all she knows how to do.

By the way, I seriously don't buy for a second that lonely men are actually contemplating violence, let alone that something needs to be done to prevent it. Violent men create solitude for themselves. Solitude does not create violence.

Trust me when I say that I personally understand the woes of the incel "movement," but I've also lived long enough to realize that my own standards and personality deficits were the reason for my status. As such, I have no more sympathy for incels than I do for feminists. Both need to get over themselves and settle, or accept that they are consciously choosing solitude. Neither option is wrong, but blaming the world for everything is.

Are they going to implement corporate virginity tests?
How exactly do they know it's not voluntary?

[–] Justintoxicated 1 points (+1|-0)

How exactly do they know it's not voluntary?

.... I think you can tell.

[–] Kannibal [OP] -1 points (+0|-1)

I think she is referring to those with the shitty juvenile entitled attitude, vs those with an inactive social life.

Do you think that's a distinction that she or anyone picking up her cause, is going to make?
These are professional victims inventing a non-existent boogeyman. They always attack the innocent when they can not find any guilty.

"Anyone who supports Trump is a racist"
"Anyone who supports Socialism is a communist"
Neither of those statements are true, but many 'activists' will claim one of them is.

'Incels' is not a real thing. It is an obscure tiny tiny group that is not attached to violence.

[–] Kannibal [OP] 0 points (+0|-0)

people worry about white supremacists as well. the actual numbers (of the hard core members) may be similar, but they are better armed.

[–] Justintoxicated 1 points (+1|-0)

Shouldn't this be in NotTheOnion?

I wonder how she's going to enforce this "what you're involuntarily celibate? Go to Ms. Pao's Office so she she can take care of that"

I think she has a fetish for undesirable men (I.E. her gay husband) and is just using this agenda to bag as many disgusting geeks as possible.

[–] Kannibal [OP] -1 points (+1|-2)

well, I suspect she is referring to those with the shitty juvenile militant entitled attitude, vs those with an inactive social life.

[–] Justintoxicated 2 points (+2|-0)

I prefer to imagine she's running around sexually assaulting ugly people but different strokes for different folks...

[–] Kannibal [OP] -1 points (+1|-2)

I think the problem is the sense of entitlement.

Why is anyone entitled to anything?

[–] Justintoxicated 0 points (+0|-0)

Why is anyone entitled to anything?

I agree, no one is entitled to shit. As a broad statement to cover everything, even if you earn something in life it doesn't mean you're going to get it. ... and no I'm not talking about sex, just in general.

[–] ThinWhiteDuke 1 points (+1|-0)

Why is society obliged to show sympathy and compassion to fat, awkward chicks that no one wants to fuck, but obliged to show hatred and contempt for skinny awkward guys that no one wants to fuck? If you don't go out of your way to virtue signal in support of unattractive women, you are "part of the problem," but guys who can't get laid? Fuck those losers. They should kill themselves.

[–] Kannibal [OP] -2 points (+0|-2)

since a lot of those red areas depend on subsidies from money from those blue areas, getting what you want might not work out the way you want