Not that they would ever exploit undocumented cheat codes in society
Never ever.
Not that they would ever exploit undocumented cheat codes in society
Never ever.
I'm not certain what you're saying or how it relates to anything I wrote. Anytime you interfere with the free market you open up the possibility of abuse, like Wal-Mart paying their employees less by having half of them on food stamps.
The less you regulate the economic liberty of citizens, the less room for abuse there will be.
I'm not certain what you're saying or how it relates to anything I wrote. Anytime you interfere with the free market you open up the possibility of abuse, like Wal-Mart paying their employees less by having half of them on food stamps.
The less you regulate the economic liberty of citizens, the less room for abuse there will be.
It's a slight bit of irony/sarcasm about politicians not ever using the equivalent of cheat codes if they could get away with it.
"The less you regulate the economic liberty of citizens, the less room for abuse there will be."
hmmm, so how do you feel about the example of price gouging?
It's a slight bit of irony/sarcasm about politicians not ever using the equivalent of cheat codes if they could get away with it.
---
>"The less you regulate the economic liberty of citizens, the less room for abuse there will be."
hmmm, so how do you feel about the example of price gouging?
Maybe the problems are too many and badly written regulations and not AI, Society, or economic liberty who try to circumvent bullshit regulations?
As did singlemotherhood and child abuse within black communities since the 1960...
http://educationnext.org/files/ednext_XV_2_mclanahan_fig01.jpg
Both of which are known to increase the likelihood of a child growing up to become a criminal. According to a research paper by the U.S. Department of justice (source: https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles/172210.pdf)
"Seventy percent of youths in State institutions are from fatherless homes."
"Eighty-five percent of rapists motivated by displaced anger are from fatherless homes"
Yeah, article seems a bit biased.
Or even very biased. Makes some interesting points about how machine learning may glitch or cheat and then uses that to make heavily biased rants about stuff they personally dislike. Just because you don't like republicans they are not a "glitch".