You're measuring him as an athlete
No I am not. I labeled him a doughboy. I specifically said he was not an athlete.
with clear athletic potential
No. Again, this kid is large, but not an athlete. That was the whole point of the comment you originally replied to.
Are you even reading before you reply?
I agree he could lose some weight
So what are you on about then? If you agree he's a dougboy, what's your point?
This kid is big, real big, but he's no athlete.
Look at him. Soft as fuck, shit conditioning.
By saying he's no athlete, you are measuring him as an athlete, not as a large fat kid. Saying a fat kid has shit conditioning is a little off - criticizing an athlete in that manner makes sense. He's no ballet dancer either, and by saying so I am measuring him as a ballet dancer and stating that he scores extremely poorly in that context.
If you comprehend, you're not the type to say so. I'll stop wasting my time.
By saying he's no athlete, you are measuring him as an athlete
Don't be stupid.
The article builds him up to be an athlete and I disputed it.
Saying a fat kid has shit conditioning is..
..a fact.
If you comprehend
I understand just fine. You're the retard that misunderstood what was clearly written.
There is no argument. You are factually wrong, and it is proven above.
Yeah, he's a dough-boy (with a lot of muscle buried under there).
You're measuring him as an athlete, but he's just a 14 year-old with clear athletic potential who seems more interested in robotics. I agree he could lose some weight either way.