Heh. Phys.org published
They aggregate published papers, and unless other sites they cite their sources.
This one is available for free, others are not and the summary on phys is all I'm interested to.
If you don't like that, I won't care.
> Heh. Phys.org published
They aggregate published papers, and unless other sites they cite their sources.
[This one](https://www.cell.com/trends/plant-science/fulltext/S1360-1385(19)30126-8?_returnURL=https%3A%2F%2Flinkinghub.elsevier.com%2Fretrieve%2Fpii%2FS1360138519301268%3Fshowall%3Dtrue) is available for free, others are not and the summary on phys is all I'm interested to.
If you don't like that, I won't care.
Heh. Phys.org published a whole article on the case against plant consciousness. Who is the phys.org editorial staff hanging out with that they think this is something that needs to be published? Phys.org. Hard-hitting science for people who do lots of yoga and shit.