More
4

It's preachers are exactly like those lying pieces of shit the christtards. Indeed climate change is one of the new religions. Created by the regressive left, who insist they are the ones all about science.

Christardery - it's the end of the world and you will suffer and die and burn forever and ever amen, unless you do what we say. Oh and give us all your money.

Climate hoaxers - it's the end of the world and you will suffer and die and burn forever and ever amen, unless you do what we say. Oh and give us all your money.

Like gay faggots, godtards and the new religionfags climate hoaxers should be tossed from high buildings.
It's preachers are exactly like those lying pieces of shit the christtards. Indeed climate change is one of the new religions. Created by the regressive left, who insist they are the ones all about science. Christardery - it's the end of the world and you will suffer and die and burn forever and ever amen, unless you do what we say. Oh and give us all your money. Climate hoaxers - it's the end of the world and you will suffer and die and burn forever and ever amen, unless you do what we say. Oh and give us all your money. Like gay faggots, godtards and the new religionfags climate hoaxers should be tossed from high buildings.

19 comments

[–] smallpond 0 points (+0|-0)

There is nearly zero existential risk to the human species becoming extinct from global warming.

Sounds like confidence that only ignorance could support. There is a very real threat of human extinction. For one plausible pathway, read the entire article

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2005/02/050223130549.htm

but the pointy part is:

In the end-Permian, as the levels of atmospheric oxygen fell and the levels of hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide rose, the upper levels of the oceans could have become rich in hydrogen sulfide catastrophically. This would kill most the oceanic plants and animals. The hydrogen sulfide dispersing in the atmosphere would kill most terrestrial life.

"A hydrogen sulfide atmosphere fits the extinction better than one enriched in carbon dioxide," says Kump. "Carbon dioxide would have a profound effect on marine life, but terrestrial plants thrive on carbon dioxide, yet they are included in the extinction."
[–] CDanger 0 points (+0|-0)

The article has nothing to do with what we're talking about. How about finding an actual scientific article discussing how humans will become extinct by human-caused global warming in the future instead of an article about how drastically the climate changed 250 million years ago? All this shows is the climate can be very volatile even without human activity.

You won't find many, because your contention is far outside the mainstream scientific consensus. Go check the IPCC and stop believing every doomsday article you read from bloggers.
[–] smallpond -1 points (+0|-1)

The only conclusion I can draw is that you didn't understand it. Nevermind.
©2016-2022 Phuks LLC. All Rights Reserved.
ToS | Privacy | Changelog | Canary | Donate | Bugs | License
Served by 08495c768707