it's a statistical study of basically all children born in Denmark over a ten year period. so I suppose you should be able to draw some conclusions from it.
It's not like you are going to double blind it somehow with another similar population because of how they were looking at things.
it's a statistical study of basically all children born in Denmark over a ten year period. so I suppose you should be able to draw some conclusions from it.
It's not like you are going to double blind it somehow with another similar population because of how they were looking at things.
I don't think anybody is claiming that vaccines reduce the chances of autism by 7%, so this indicates we really don't know the drivers of outcomes are in these complex systems.
So what even was the point of the study and what does it prove? I doubt vaccines cause autism, but isn't real science.