Again I rely on facts and physical proof, not hearsay and blogs.
Now once again move on.
Again I rely on facts and physical proof, not hearsay and blogs.
Now once again move on.
Again I rely on facts and physical proof, not hearsay and blogs.
For whatever reason, you're running from objective reality, this is not hearsay and blogs - this is a 30 year global consensus of climate scientists.
Global warming is going to be obvious enough for even the most ignorant in 50 to 100 years time, but you'll likely be dead then and our children will be paying for our mistakes. Intelligent creatures have the ability to plan ahead: if you're skiing down a slope heading for a cliff, waiting for physical proof with your eyes closed isn't a smart move.
> Again I rely on facts and physical proof, not hearsay and blogs.
For whatever reason, you're running from objective reality, this is not hearsay and blogs - [this is a 30 year global consensus of climate scientists](http://ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/publications_and_data_reports.shtml).
Global warming is going to be obvious enough for even the most ignorant in 50 to 100 years time, but you'll likely be dead then and our children will be paying for our mistakes. Intelligent creatures have the ability to plan ahead: if you're skiing down a slope heading for a cliff, waiting for physical proof with your eyes closed isn't a smart move.
It's an anonymous internet forum - any credentials I claim are meaningless. However, you can see that my arguments obviously make more sense than yours regarding global warming, and agree with those who do have the credentials.