[–] E-werd 4 points (+4|-0) I think they misunderstood the note someone made. It actually means it was the part that determined your junk. I think they misunderstood the note someone made. It actually means it was the part that determined your junk. permalink source
[–] GreenTreeFrog 3 points (+3|-0) They are still calling 98% of the genome junk? We don't know the meaning/uses of it does not make it junk. They are still calling 98% of the genome junk? We don't know the meaning/uses of it does not make it junk. permalink source
[–] Dii_Casses [OP] 1 points (+1|-0) I wonder how much this is related to the withering Y gene. I wonder how much this is related to the [withering Y gene](http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-5302565/The-Y-chromosome-going-happen-men.html). permalink source [–] ScorpioGlitch 0 points (+0|-0) Edited Dude, Y gene and withering.... not in the same sentence, man! Dude, Y gene and withering.... not in the same sentence, man! permalink source
[–] ScorpioGlitch 0 points (+0|-0) Edited Dude, Y gene and withering.... not in the same sentence, man! Dude, Y gene and withering.... not in the same sentence, man! permalink source
I think they misunderstood the note someone made. It actually means it was the part that determined your junk.