[–] [Deleted] 4 points (+4|-0) Molten salt reactors are more stable that a water-cooled reactor, but they have a lot of maintenance issues. I'd go with pebble-bed reactors. Molten salt reactors are more stable that a water-cooled reactor, but they have a lot of maintenance issues. I'd go with pebble-bed reactors. permalink source
[–] Dii_Casses -2 points (+0|-2) The NIMBY crowd doesn't want to hear it. The NIMBY crowd doesn't want to hear it. permalink source [–] xyzzy [OP] 2 points (+2|-0) It doesn't have to be built at a river and can be in a remote location. It doesn't have to be built at a river and can be in a remote location. permalink source [–] Dii_Casses -1 points (+1|-2) Oh I agree; I'm just pessimistic that it won't be regarded as Green enough. Oh I agree; I'm just pessimistic that it won't be regarded as Green enough. permalink source
[–] xyzzy [OP] 2 points (+2|-0) It doesn't have to be built at a river and can be in a remote location. It doesn't have to be built at a river and can be in a remote location. permalink source [–] Dii_Casses -1 points (+1|-2) Oh I agree; I'm just pessimistic that it won't be regarded as Green enough. Oh I agree; I'm just pessimistic that it won't be regarded as Green enough. permalink source
[–] Dii_Casses -1 points (+1|-2) Oh I agree; I'm just pessimistic that it won't be regarded as Green enough. Oh I agree; I'm just pessimistic that it won't be regarded as Green enough. permalink source
Molten salt reactors are more stable that a water-cooled reactor, but they have a lot of maintenance issues. I'd go with pebble-bed reactors.