In 1409, a council was convened at Pisa to resolve the issue. The council declared both existing popes to be schismatic (Gregory XII from Rome, Benedict XIII from Avignon) and appointed a new one, Alexander V. But the existing popes had not been persuaded to resign, so the church had three popes.
I did not know that two popes were ever in charge at once, let alone three. I must have entirely missed that. Never though was there not a pope of the roman catholic faith? I need to look into this a lot more to get a feel for it.
>In 1409, a council was convened at Pisa to resolve the issue. The council declared both existing popes to be schismatic (Gregory XII from Rome, Benedict XIII from Avignon) and appointed a new one, Alexander V. But the existing popes had not been persuaded to resign, so the church had three popes.
I did not know that two popes were ever in charge at once, let alone three. I must have entirely missed that. Never though was there not a pope of the roman catholic faith? I need to look into this a lot more to get a feel for it.
I meant before the Protestant Reformation and from the HRE specifically, since those were the only Anti-Popes I knew of, but it seems much more fuzzy than that. The HRE was formed from a priest basically elevated to Pope who then crowned his liege Holy Roman Emperor.
1378 to 1417 which Catholic scholars refer to as the "Western Schism" or, "the great controversy of the antipopes" (also called "the second great schism" by some secular and Protestant historians), there was a period of great difficulty.
Definitely way more complex than one thinks with only a passing glance at their history. :p
EDIT: Was slightly misleading how I had it organized.