Many might think so, but an actual news site that isn't just performance art can't discuss that one implication of one of those 18 demands in isolation - because it blatantly obscures basic background information about that implication.
Seriously, if you were personally writing that as a news article, could you have done such an incompetent job? Of course writing an article to entertain and mislead people who swallow Jones's bullshit is a different task.
Many might think so, but an actual news site that isn't [just performance art](https://www.cbsnews.com/video/alex-jones-lawyer-says-infowars-host-is-a-performance-artist/) can't discuss that one implication of one of those 18 demands in isolation - because it blatantly obscures basic background information about that implication.
Seriously, if you were personally writing that as a news article, could you have done such an incompetent job? Of course writing an article to entertain and mislead people who swallow Jones's bullshit is a different task.
The students had 18 demands, and infowars inexplicably focused on one aspect of one demand - they could have discussed all, and objected to several of the 18 demands, and still kept their readership happy regarding ideology.
I have no idea why they would write such a sloppy article. Perhaps it's just the behavior of a compulsive liar or liars? Maybe they wish to clearly highlight that they're a joke of a news source for those capable of identifying journalistic standards? ...