Well, someone has to hear it - usually a high court in a state can make the decision, and then you appeal up to a Federal court, and then appeal up to the Supreme Court, if they like, who then decides one way or the other (if they hear the case at all).
Well, someone has to hear it - usually a high court in a state can make the decision, and then you appeal up to a Federal court, and then appeal up to the Supreme Court, if they like, who then decides one way or the other (if they hear the case at all).
Last I heard, Wisconsin and Washington filed suit against the federal government, which is still pending? I assumed that would be where this could be overturned.
Last I heard, Wisconsin and Washington filed suit against the federal government, which is still pending? I assumed that would be where this could be overturned.
No idea, I haven't really been following. I think the typical path is state court (if it can be resolved by a state court; I presume this wouldn't be), and then it goes to a circuit court of appeals, and possibly the Supreme Court. But I'm not 100%.
No idea, I haven't really been following. I think the typical path is state court (if it can be resolved by a state court; I presume this wouldn't be), and then it goes to a circuit court of appeals, and possibly the Supreme Court. But I'm not 100%.
Yep, I'm just kind of surprised that a federally appointed state-level judge can overturn an Executive Order, even temporarily. I assumed that would have to go to the supreme court, but I guess I was wrong about that