For instance, in 2011, the Obama White House rejected the judgment of Justice Department and Pentagon officials and decided it had the authority to continue military operations in Libya without seeking approval from Congress.
Checks and balances are for losers, am-i-right? Thanks for the sauce, goes well with my eggs
>For instance, in 2011, the Obama White House rejected the judgment of Justice Department and Pentagon officials and decided it had the authority to continue military operations in Libya without seeking approval from Congress.
Checks and balances are for losers, am-i-right? Thanks for the sauce, goes well with my eggs
https://lawfareblog.com/malevolence-tempered-incompetence-trumps-horrifying-executive-order-refugees-and-visas
http://www.npr.org/2017/01/27/511998206/key-justice-dept-office-won-t-say-if-it-approved-white-house-executive-orders
http://edition.cnn.com/2017/01/28/politics/donald-trump-travel-ban/index.html
https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-01-29/rule-of-law-1-trump-s-immigration-ban-0
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-38791752
To name a few. It was in almost all the media last week: