5

5 comments

[–] chmod 2 points (+2|-0)

Yea, I heard the same thing 25 years ago. And look at this, I'm still alive. I'm getting tired of hearing this garbage.

[–] webofslime 1 points (+1|-0)

Yea, I read about the same thing in a newspaper article from the late 1800's. And look at this, I'm still alive. I'm getting tired of hearing this garbage.

https://i.imgur.com/KVLAfb7.png

https://imgur.com/weWjFfM

[–] Kannibal [OP] 2 points (+2|-0)

so then we need to determine actual facts. Honest research, and good logic


People are a lot less skeptical when it comes to their health. When 90% of doctors say you have ABC condition, then you certainly pay attention.

95% or more of actual client researchers say their is a problem = a vast global conspiracy

The telling point is when politicians shut down research instead of funding more to settle the question. This reveals the short term profit motive (fuck the kids) and argues against the idea that there is a good faith discussion of the facts.

It is increasing obvious that opposition to the idea of climate change is not in good faith, not by the major players.

It is too much a political football for points (We win!) instead of focusing on the survival questions.

Like those short sighted people who have to drive their cars across the flooded roads because something is "very important" and suddenly the car gets washed away. The thing they were worried about was so important they literally did not see the danger in front of them.

Natural selection in action. The real problem is when it is not just one life, but many.

So then we need to determine actual facts. Honest research, and good logic, and then make honest decisions.

[–] F6F_Hellcat 0 points (+2|-2) Edited

Yea, I heard the same thing 15 years ago. And look at this, I'm still alive. I'm getting tired of hearing this garbage.