I disagree but don't see the sense on beating a dead horse since we've already established we can't/won't change each other's mind.
I disagree but don't see the sense on beating a dead horse since we've already established we can't/won't change each other's mind.
Curious, just to know: what do you disagree on?
Curious, just to know: what do you disagree on?
They found out that they wouldn't get a free life handed to them and that they would not only have to work if they got in, they'd have to prove that they had a legitimate reason to be allowed in when they didn't follow the proper procedures. In other words, the dystopian paradise promised by Democrats didn't happen for them and now they're butthurt and have to run home.
All that support (including paying for their cell phones, meals, shelter, and rides along the way) just went up in smoke. I'll wager a lot of them will die on the way back. They should have taken Mexico's offer for residency and jobs and help.
As a result, there will be far fewer, if any, migrant caravans in the near future. There'd be even less if the further right individuals who just wanted them shot down had gotten their way (which, I get their perspective not that they want them killed but they want active incentive for people to not do this again).
When you feed strays, they eventually move in. It's a cliche for a reason.