None but difference is that I actually know what I'm talking about.
In DC, merely resisting an officer passively is assault. So, like I said, if he'd done that to an officer, he'd been arrested for assault.
And, like I said, I'm sorry that you don't agree with it but that's how it is.
None but difference is that I actually know what I'm talking about.
[In DC, merely resisting an officer passively is assault](https://ggwash.org/view/9476/assaulting-a-police-officer-may-not-mean-what-you-think). So, like I said, if he'd done that to an officer, he'd been arrested for assault.
And, like I said, I'm sorry that you don't agree with it but that's how it is.
> None but difference is that I actually know what I'm talking about.
So in your reasoning standing still next to a woman is already assault....
Your reasoning is crooked and that is how it is.....
[> None but difference is that I actually know what I'm talking about.](https://i.amz.mshcdn.com/mjt8LVXX43eSLE6WwwMpoLurfgA=/950x534/filters:quality(90)/https%3A%2F%2Fblueprint-api-production.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Fcard%2Fimage%2F194130%2Fmeme.jpg)
So in your reasoning standing still next to a woman is already assault....
Your reasoning is crooked and that is how it is.....
And how many court cases have you won to use as evidence that you actually know what you're talking about?