Sub rules for /s/news were suggested and agreed upon by the phuks.co users. Please have a look at the sidebar and familiarise yourself with the brief set of sub rules before posting.
Thanks.
The problem is "increasing" is subjective so it can quickly lead to editorialising. One persons improvement is anothers tub thumping.
The problem is "increasing" is subjective so it can quickly lead to editorialising. One persons improvement is anothers tub thumping.
What if you're de-editorialising the original headline, often times titles are amped up for SEO/clickbait reasons on sites while the article (which is written by a different person) may be quality content.
What if you're de-editorialising the original headline, often times titles are amped up for SEO/clickbait reasons on sites while the article (which is written by a different person) may be quality content.
I get your point, but IM(notso)HO I think I do better than an editor paid for clicks. I'll revise titles whenever I find I'd be more objective. Not the other way.
I get your point, but IM(notso)HO I think I do better than an editor paid for clicks. I'll revise titles whenever I find I'd be more objective. Not the other way.
Not that I'd downvote, but sometimes headlines are stupid clickbait. I don't see a problem in users increasing headlines. I know it's against rules, but as long as it improves the experience, I'll back them.