>[Sputnik engages in bias and disinformation,[5] and has widely been described as a Russian propaganda outlet](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sputnik_(news_agency)).
And? Is there anything in this article that you think is wrong or misleading? Are you saying this didn't happen?
A simple Google search will confirm the authenticity of the event.
And? Is there anything in this article that you think is wrong or misleading?
[Are you saying this didn't happen?](https://www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3276075-Sweden-historical-open-air-bath-removes-sex-barriers-for-queer-day-women-driven-home-by-ogling-men)
A simple Google search will confirm the authenticity of the event.
> Mumsnet discussions don't really count as a a credible source.
When it is all sourced it does. Read it before critiquing.
[Or visit the spa page](https://www.ribersborgskallbadhus.se/sv/nyhet/7-5-%C3%A4r-det-premi%C3%A4r-f%C3%B6r-Queer-Kallis-1)
This should have been easily predicted.
The rules to separate the sexes is to provide comfort and security. Removing those rules will not improve those traits for anyone. Not even 'queer' folk.
This is what happens when people think with their heart instead of their head.
Your heart is caring, but stupid.
This should have been easily predicted.
The rules to separate the sexes is to provide comfort and security. Removing those rules will not improve those traits for anyone. Not even 'queer' folk.
This is what happens when people think with their heart instead of their head.
Your heart is caring, but stupid.
No memes or images. Exceptions may be made in the case of images of an ongoing news story becoming available.
User-edited titles are not allowed. Copy the headline directly and use it as the post title. Corrections in spelling or minor alterations may be acceptable.
News articles written over a month before posting must have the date of the article in the post title.
No paywalls. Use an archived link to post a paywalled article.
11 comments
And? Is there anything in this article that you think is wrong or misleading?
Are you saying this didn't happen?
A simple Google search will confirm the authenticity of the event.
Please provide alternative information to support your position.Unfortunately Mumsnet discussions don't really count as a a credible source.
When it is all sourced it does. Read it before critiquing.
Or visit the spa page
But, but, but ... tolerance.
Tolerance does not apply to white males.
Here it is Sunday ... a beautiful bright and sunny day ... and I can't even think of anyone to oppress with my male whiteness. I'm slipping.
This should have been easily predicted.
The rules to separate the sexes is to provide comfort and security. Removing those rules will not improve those traits for anyone. Not even 'queer' folk.
This is what happens when people think with their heart instead of their head.
Your heart is caring, but stupid.
Chalk it up in the 'who would have thought?' column.