The intended target counts, too
Sure, but we have no idea who was intended. All we know that he struck members of the public.
So, there are indications that it could be terrorism.
> The intended target counts, too
Sure, but we have no idea who was intended. All we know that he struck members of the public.
So, there are *indications* that it could be terrorism.
The intended target counts, too. Injuring someone not affiliated with the NSA does not automatically make it terrorism; it just means he was sloppy and adds attempted vehicular manslaughter charges to the list.
And it's not like they build these checkpoints directly on the property boundary; he left the public sphere probably a few hundred feet back down the road.