The people who described the contacts to Reuters said they had seen no evidence of wrongdoing or collusion between the campaign and Russia in the communications reviewed so far.
> The people who described the contacts to Reuters said they had seen no evidence of wrongdoing or collusion between the campaign and Russia in the communications reviewed so far.
So, despite all the screaming and tears, there is exactly 0 evidence of any wrong-doing by Trumps team.
Nothing at all.
It's impressive how they can dominate my newsfeeds, drowning out real stories, yet have absolutely nothing.
What happened to standards in news? Are they not even pretending to be balanced, impartial, or informative anymore?
At least this article admitted there was nothing there. But they hid it in the center of the article, where the loudest screamers never read, and gave it a somewhat misleading title.
So, despite all the screaming and tears, there is exactly 0 evidence of any wrong-doing by Trumps team.
Nothing at all.
It's impressive how they can dominate my newsfeeds, drowning out real stories, yet have absolutely nothing.
What happened to standards in news? Are they not even pretending to be balanced, impartial, or informative anymore?
At least this article admitted there was nothing there. But they hid it in the center of the article, where the loudest screamers never read, and gave it a somewhat misleading title.
No memes or images. Exceptions may be made in the case of images of an ongoing news story becoming available.
User-edited titles are not allowed. Copy the headline directly and use it as the post title. Corrections in spelling or minor alterations may be acceptable.
News articles written over a month before posting must have the date of the article in the post title.
No paywalls. Use an archived link to post a paywalled article.
3 comments
So, despite all the screaming and tears, there is exactly 0 evidence of any wrong-doing by Trumps team.
Nothing at all.
It's impressive how they can dominate my newsfeeds, drowning out real stories, yet have absolutely nothing.
What happened to standards in news? Are they not even pretending to be balanced, impartial, or informative anymore?
At least this article admitted there was nothing there. But they hid it in the center of the article, where the loudest screamers never read, and gave it a somewhat misleading title.