I read the whole thing to see what else he had done.
Nothing.
While undercover he slept with a 19 year old. It does not say what his age at the time was, but it seems to have happened in the mid 90's, and I'm guessing that would have put him in his 20's or 30's.
Other than cheating on his wife, he did nothing wrong.
And while it doesn't excuse it, the fact that he was undercover does partly mitigate that. He had to play the role.
What the fuck is wrong the modern media.
I read the whole thing to see what else he had done.
Nothing.
While undercover he slept with a 19 year old. It does not say what his age at the time was, but it seems to have happened in the mid 90's, and I'm guessing that would have put him in his 20's or 30's.
Other than cheating on his wife, he did nothing wrong.
And while it doesn't excuse it, the fact that he was undercover does partly mitigate that. He had to play the role.
What the fuck is wrong the modern media.
No memes or images. Exceptions may be made in the case of images of an ongoing news story becoming available.
User-edited titles are not allowed. Copy the headline directly and use it as the post title. Corrections in spelling or minor alterations may be acceptable.
News articles written over a month before posting must have the date of the article in the post title.
No paywalls. Use an archived link to post a paywalled article.
I read the whole thing to see what else he had done.
Nothing.
While undercover he slept with a 19 year old. It does not say what his age at the time was, but it seems to have happened in the mid 90's, and I'm guessing that would have put him in his 20's or 30's.
Other than cheating on his wife, he did nothing wrong.
And while it doesn't excuse it, the fact that he was undercover does partly mitigate that. He had to play the role.
What the fuck is wrong the modern media.