7

I suppose it could be normal- it's becoming more insular and homogenous and the topics follow in their extremity- but I wonder sometimes whether the narratives being pushed are truly organic.

There are some fishy accounts who seem, to me, to not be who they claim to be- and I don't mean the obvious distractions like Amalek and Sanegoat and Engrish/nogarbage. These fishy accounts seem like users playing a role that doesn't quite match up with their writing style & content.

I don't care to name names openly. More observation is needed.

Maybe I'm just becoming schizo.

I suppose it could be normal- it's becoming more insular and homogenous and the topics follow in their extremity- but I wonder sometimes whether the narratives being pushed are truly organic. There are some fishy accounts who seem, to me, to not be who they claim to be- and I don't mean the obvious distractions like Amalek and Sanegoat and Engrish/nogarbage. These fishy accounts seem like users playing a role that doesn't quite match up with their writing style & content. I don't care to name names openly. More observation is needed. Maybe I'm just becoming schizo.

7 comments

[–] phoxy [OP] 3 points (+3|-0)

Others in that style (little community participation, lots of posts) are HWY395, SomeguyfromRI, and a number of other newer names. It's hard for me to judge whether an account is pushing an agenda because I blocked almost all the subs where politics dominate.

[–] PhunkyPlatypus 2 points (+2|-0)

You're right, although most of those users are posting random content of some substance. They may not participate but they're not driving any particular agenda.

The users I listed post nothing but anti immigration stuff.