Looks to me as though they're trying to get rid of the sub. In the past, they have made a decision on removing mods of subs and putting new ones in without too much user interaction, and they have never directly asked if a sub should be left to rot before.
The fact that the conversation can not be had without it being anon says a lot about the decline of Voat's community.
The term investor implies that they expect a return on their money. And I hate to break it to you, but anyone with money to invest isn't going to give free speech a more important priority than their money with which they expect a return on. What they really need if they want to live is a high profile donor, not that I hope that happens, as they do not deserve it.
I wasn't suggesting that the person was putting money into the project to get a return more that they were putting money in to support their own belief on free speech.
I know that you didn't specifically mention an investor, I just assumed that you were talking about it due to your response to the og comment. My mistake
they need to find someone who believes in free speech above all else.