It's just hotel owners being cronies.
Not in the city I live in. It's a very quiet, affluent and older residential area. I'm on the young side for a resident being in my 30s. Every community within a mile of me has banned smoking. It's that kind of area where they can pass things like that.
For a large area, there are literally no hotels. Residents did not like the rowdy crowd coming in for a few days at a time during tourist season and disrupting their quiet community/neighborhoods. Full-time renters like myself are looked down upon.
I can understand why they did it, but I'm not saying I agree with it.
>It's just hotel owners being cronies.
Not in the city I live in. It's a very quiet, affluent and older residential area. I'm on the young side for a resident being in my 30s. Every community within a mile of me has banned smoking. It's that kind of area where they can pass things like that.
For a large area, there are literally no hotels. Residents did not like the rowdy crowd coming in for a few days at a time during tourist season and disrupting their quiet community/neighborhoods. Full-time renters like myself are looked down upon.
I can understand why they did it, but I'm not saying I agree with it.
I don't think it's understandable in any circumstance. If it's my home, I can do what I want with it unless I enter into a voluntary agreement to do something else.
It's just hotel owners being cronies. Same as taxi company owners raising license fees and banning Uber in a bunch of cities. It's anti-capitalist and as far as I'm concerned treasonous.