I know human biodiversity isn't the most popular topic, but why doesn't anyone say anything? Well, not really 'anyone'. @unruly actually responded via posts and invited me to respond. Why are most other people not willing to say anything?
Any biodiversity that shows whites having an advantage will be declared racist and the ISP will have it removed if they see it. So to me you couldn't really have an honest discussion about it. I am less interested in any differences than I am in what individuals do or believe. I'm interested in Neanderthals and stuff though.
Any biodiversity that shows whites having an advantage will be declared racist and the ISP will have it removed if they see it. So to me you couldn't really have an honest discussion about it. I am less interested in any differences than I am in what individuals do or believe. I'm interested in Neanderthals and stuff though.
Some pretty racist stuff has been tolerated here in the past - I think the occasional reasoned discussion of IQ or some advantages of being pasty would be fine.
Some pretty racist stuff has been tolerated here in the past - I think the occasional reasoned discussion of IQ or some advantages of being pasty would be fine.
declared racist and the ISP will have it removed if they see it.
I forgot about that. I guess this is encouragement to focus on non-whites and probably away from IQ too. Not terrible, honestly.
> declared racist and the ISP will have it removed if they see it.
I forgot about that. I guess this is encouragement to focus on non-whites and probably away from IQ too. Not terrible, honestly.
While I understand the reasons behind that sentiment, I have to disagree. If some races have longer legs on average they are on average better at running. There are strengths and weaknesses that are of varying degrees of importance like basic survival, living in different climates and existing in modern society (I'm not trying to imply living in the modern world is least important, it's just that those traits are relatively newer).