On that site, everything is filler ;-) I thought it was a good article. It's all relative. I don't expect the same detail from a livescience plasma physics article as I do from IEEE's plasma transactions. I keep the source in mind when I decide on how to classify a site's content.
On that site, everything is filler ;-) I thought it was a good article. It's all relative. I don't expect the same detail from a livescience plasma physics article as I do from IEEE's plasma transactions. I keep the source in mind when I decide on how to classify a site's content.
It was a comment on a video, it wasn't a "great article". Her bio is longer than the article.