6

I think archeologists and historians misinterpret the purpose of pyramids.

posted by Sarcastaway on Discussion

I'm convinced that pyramids were built more as bunkers than as tombs. Sure they were used as such, but consider their features and utility.

High-ground gives archers range, and long line of sight. Horses couldn't traverse the steep surfaces, and foot solders would have to fight uphill. Traps and secret passages make navigation a daunting task. Stone construction prevents arson and render any sort of siege weapons useless. Food and novelties ensure a long stay is possible.

Rulers of these ancient cultures often had invading armies and their own subjects to to hide from. Pyramids seem like the most practical solution to this problem.

I'm convinced that pyramids were built more as bunkers than as tombs. Sure they were used as such, but consider their features and utility. High-ground gives archers range, and long line of sight. Horses couldn't traverse the steep surfaces, and foot solders would have to fight uphill. Traps and secret passages make navigation a daunting task. Stone construction prevents arson and render any sort of siege weapons useless. Food and novelties ensure a long stay is possible. Rulers of these ancient cultures often had invading armies and their own subjects to to hide from. Pyramids seem like the most practical solution to this problem.

7 comments

[–] PhunkyPlatypus 3 points (+3|-0)

You seem to be mixing up the time period. The pyramids are what like 3000 BC? My ancient history is pretty shit, but IIRC seige weapons first started with archimedes and the Greeks in like 500 bc. It might just be me, but it sounds like you're referring to more medieval sort of weaponry.

I may be totally wrong, but I can't recall any thing that would properly fall into that category.

Wait I have an idea..

Summoning @lockeproposal

[–] LockeProposal 3 points (+3|-0)

No, you're about correct. As far as I'm aware, siege weaponry wasn't prevalent in this time period. Walled cities were in some areas, but armies generally fought outside the walls. Chariots were big at this time.

I don't have any sources in front of me to quote as I just got off shift, but if someone has anything to add, I'd gladly check beck into this conversation when I wake up.

[–] Sarcastaway [OP] 2 points (+2|-0)

Thanks for contributing to the discussion.

I think you're probably right about siege weapons not being around during ancient Egyptian times. I do wonder though, were large battering rams used during that era? A battering ram seems low-tech enough that someone must have had the idea to pull one around behind a chariot.

Posted by Sarcastaway
Score: 6 (+6|-0)

/s/Discussion

4 subscribers

Ask a thought-provoking question to start a discussion, or make a challenging statement to start a debate.

There are only three rules:

1) Only start a discussion if you are open-minded on the topic you choose.

2) Only submit text posts. Links in the body of a post are fine.

3) No purposefully divisive or leading questions. If you want a debate, make your title a statement.

Moderators

Sarcastaway

Created by Sarcastaway

Sub Log Banned Users