No, not at all. It's actually quite hard to win, in my estimation; although you can lose very quickly in some cases, although you might be able to convince your attackers that you're more useful alive than dead (I've seen it happen; and heard of cases where someone knocked down to a single unit and supply center was able to come back and solo win the game).
Here is what may be a better map showing the number of provinces. I wouldn't say there's a ton, especially to a game like Axis and Allies, but there's enough for the purposes of this game; I suppose that's the best way of putting it.
EDIT: Most games of Diplomacy likely end in a draw between some number of players - although a few have likely lost by then.
No, not at all. It's actually quite hard to win, in my estimation; although you can lose very quickly in some cases, although you might be able to convince your attackers that you're more useful alive than dead (I've seen it happen; and heard of cases where someone knocked down to a single unit and supply center was able to come back and solo win the game).
[Here is what may be a better map showing the number of provinces.](http://www.diplomacy-archive.com/regularmaps/standard.gif) I wouldn't say there's a ton, especially to a game like _Axis and Allies_, but there's enough for the purposes of this game; I suppose that's the best way of putting it.
EDIT: Most games of Diplomacy likely end in a draw between some number of players - although a few have likely lost by then.
Maybe it's because I haven't watched the other parts, but I don't get it. The board seems incredibly small with not that many provinces. Isn't it too easy to win or lose?